Pavle Marinkov vs Carl Emil Overbeck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Oct at 01:10 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Marinkov vs C. Emil Overbeck

 AUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win

 DEN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Marinkov 0 - 1 Overbeck
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pavle Marinkov winning 0 and Carl Emil Overbeck winning 2. The last match between Carl Emil Overbeck and Pavle Marinkov was at the M25 Brisbane, 31-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Carl Emil Overbeck getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Marinkov | 0 | 
| Overbeck | 1 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Brisbane(10-31-25)
P. Marinkov vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 54.03% (67-57) | Career Total W/L | 63.24% (43-25) | 
| 0 | Hard | 1 | 
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
P. Marinkov vs C. E. Overbeck Match Preview:
- In second serve points, Carl Emil Overbeck slightly outperforms Pavle Marinkov, winning 41.27% compared to Marinkov's 40.16%. Could this slight edge make a difference in their match outcome?
- Regarding return game stats, Overbeck impressively wins 46.51% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Marinkov's 42.44%. Similarly, Overbeck leads in first serve returns, with 29.68% against Marinkov's 27.52%.
- Breakpoints saved is another area where Overbeck excels, with a 49.03% save rate versus Marinkov's 45.00%. Would this give Overbeck an advantage in clutch moments?
- Looking at their overall performance in the past year, Overbeck has a higher match win percentage of 63.33% compared to Marinkov's 53.45%.
- Both players have their best win percentage on hard courts at 56%, but on clay, their performance diverges; Marinkov has a lower 40% win rate compared to Overbeck's 60%.
- In the context of playing level, Overbeck plays and wins more frequently at the same event level as Marinkov, showing a slight upper hand in competitive consistency.
- Even though their opponent quality is almost equivalent, Overbeck has shown better results in deciding sets, winning 67% versus Marinkov's 53%.
Editorial Prediction (October 31, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match draws near, both Pavle Marinkov and Carl Emil Overbeck show distinct strengths and weaknesses. Overbeck demonstrates a slight edge in second serve performance and return game effectiveness, which could be pivotal in tight exchanges.
Additionally, Carl Emil Overbeck's superior breakpoint saving ability can potentially swing momentum in crucial stages of the match, favoring his outcome in clutch situations. His higher win ratios over the past year suggest a consistent performance level, reinforcing his potential advantage.
While both players perform well on hard courts, Carl Emil Overbeck's higher win rate on clay and successful performance in deciding sets bolster the case for him as the favored player. Therefore, synthesizing these stats, Carl Emil Overbeck appears more likely to secure a victory in their imminent encounter.
Pavle Marinkov vs Carl Emil Overbeck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Marinkov vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 9 | Games Won | 13 | 
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 7 | 
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 1:54:3 | Average Match Time | 1:54:3 | 
| 55% (36/66) | 1st Serve % | 54% (37/69) | 
| 69% (25/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (31/37) | 
| 50% (15/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (18/32) | 
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) | 
| 29% (20/69) | Return Points Win % | 39% (26/66) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
P. Marinkov Recent Matches Played
C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played

P. Marinkov vs C. E. Overbeck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.03% (67/57) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.24% (43/25) | 
| 52.33% (146/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.87% (91/61) | 
| 51.50% (1339/1261) | Games Win/Loss | 54.56% (777/647) | 
| 55.34% (57/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 73.33% (11/4) | 
| 40.00% (4/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.42% (29/19) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) | 
| 54.55% (6/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 | 
| 489 | Aces Total | 175 | 
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 | 
| 371 | Total Double Faults | 156 | 
| 1:30:42 | Average Match Time | 1:11:40 | 
| 357.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 313.29 | 
| 59% (4077/6908) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2095/3282) | 
| 70% (2857/4077) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1398/2095) | 
| 49% (1391/2831) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (552/1187) | 
| 41% (284/694) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (159/351) | 
| 39% (2716/6945) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1365/3234) | 
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 47.37% (9/10) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) | 
| 56.31% (58/45) | Futures W/L | 66.15% (43/22) | 
| 54% (66/123) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (43/68) | 
| 34% (10/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 
| 59% (19/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 69% (11/16) | 
| 90% (70/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (36/35) | 
| 10% (70/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (36/1) | 
| 7% (54/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (32/8) | 












